SHOCKER (1989)
Reviewed by Jerry Saravia
Wes Craven's "Shocker" is witless, hardly electrifying horror garbage. It belongs in a scrap heap, or burned along with some old, broken-down televisions. It is a poor man's Freddy Krueger, with far less ingenuity and imagination.
Horace Pinker (Mitch Pileggi) is a brutal serial killer who kills entire families in their homes, thanks to his job as a TV repairman that allows him easy access! Aspiring college football player Jonathan Parker (Peter Berg) has premonitions of Pinker and where he will kill next. Jonathan's adoptive family is the next target, and another probable target is the standard-issue blonde girlfriend (Camille Cooper)! Parker's father (Michael Murphy, looking quite dazed) is a police detective who is perplexed by his son's gift! Once Pinker is captured, he is fried in an electrical chair that transforms him into an electronic Freddy Krueger energy source of some kind (with a bald spot covered by burns) who zaps himself from one unlucky soul to the next to continue his murderous bidding. In one clever scene, he brings along Jonathan and both are zapped from one TV program to another, which includes a brief appearance by Timothy Leary!
There are multiple problems with "Shocker." For one, the villain is too one-dimensional - he is simply a raving maniac with a lust for blood. Yep, that is one for the books. I don't need to know why someone kills in a movie, but a backstory wouldn't have hurt. Freddy Krueger had his reasons - we learned he was burned to death by the townspeople. The only illuminating aspect to Horace Pinker is that he runs a loop of grisly war footage on his TV's! And playing Megadeth's "No More Mr. Nice Guy" adds some level of wit, to the soundtrack anyway.
As for Peter Berg, he is practically an emotionless actor so that when the big scene arrives of witnessing his murdered girlfriend's corpse with blood splattered on the walls (hate to spoil that one), his reaction is that of a kid who just found out his bike was stolen! Michael Murphy doesn't register much either as the beleaguered father - he seemed more hot and bothered by Jill Clayburgh in "An Unmarried Woman" than here.
Wes Craven has crafted some imaginative ideas into the dream vortex that he brought about so elegantly in "A Nightmare on Elm Street," and attempts to bring some of that same dream logic here. But most of this movie is unmemorable and far too brutally violent to the point of nausea. The movie screams exclamation marks, the psycho stalks, screams and sweats in exclamation marks, and the editing and direction elicit exclamation marks. It is a movie punctuated with exclamation marks sans punctuation in between those exclamations for them to comfortably settle in.








