"Badlands" is infrequently an insufferable chore to sit through yet it is also a stunningly poetic film about something that shouldn't be so beautifully portrayed - aimless young people on a crime spree. For its 1970's context, think "Bonnie and Clyde" yet more brutal and less engaging in emotions. This young couple could care less, roaming through the Dakotas and Montana on the run without a thought in their heads.
Naturally with first-time director Terrence Malick, the young couple are not romanticized nor are they colorfully or cartoonishly portrayed - they are just boring. Martin Sheen is 25-year-old Kit who can't hold a job as a garbage collector yet he is handy with a gun - when he aims to shoot, he never seems to miss his human target. As he rolls through town, he spots an innocent fifteen-year-old girl named Holly (Sissy Spacek) and all he wants to do is walk with her and speak his mind. Truth is Kit has nothing to say and has little to no regard for anyone except himself. Holly sees him as a James Dean-type which was enough to make want to vomit. There is a nonchalant void in these two from the start so when Kit shoots Holly's stern father (Warren Oates), I wasn't surprised yet I still felt a sudden shock. The twosome burn the house down, leave an audio recording where they claim to have killed themselves, briefly live in the woods in their own little ramshackle wooden shack and pack up and leave after they kill some passerby (bounty hunters, Kit seems to think).
"Badlands" is a road movie about two nihilistic nitwits who are as stupid and shallow as you can imagine. Kit fancies himself as James Dean yet he possesses no intelligence. When Holly approaches potential shooting victims, she just says "Hi!" Kit whirls his gun and kills without much hesitation, though he at least issues a warning. A scene involving an innocent couple who inadvertently show up at Kit's co-worker's house is one of the more shocking because we do not see anything - shots are fired plainly as the couple is forced into a storm cellar but no blood is shown. What is striking is one sequence where Kit forces himself into a rich man's home and doesn't kill the rich man or the maid. Why? Who can say except that maybe the rich man did not yell or act aggressive or retaliate? When we get to the eventual capture of Kit and Holly after an exhaustive manhunt, Kit thanks the police for capturing him and knows he has become some sort of mini-celebrity.
Based on the infamous 1950's crime spree perpetrated by Charles Starkweather and Caril Fugate (the similar incidents as depicted in the film were much worse in reality), Malick has made an intelligent, psychological observation of stupid kids. Crime doesn't pay and nor does stupidity.






