Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Fun, wobbly, stoned Jedi mind tricks

RETURN OF THE JEDI (1983) 
Reviewed by Jerry Saravia

A sequel hated by most Star Wars fans and considered to be humdrum, silly, nearly self-parodic, and overwrought. Yes, all of those things are true, and "Return of the Jedi" is also great fun.

"Return of the Jedi" (originally titled "Revenge of the Jedi") follows and tidies up the events left open at the end of The Empire Strikes Back. Luke and Leia rescue Han Solo (and thaw him out of his frozen carbonated stage) from the throes of the evil Jabba the Hutt. Luke, the Jedi apprentice, goes back to the Dagobah system to see the dying Yoda who has nothing left to teach him except, go face Darth Vader all over again (still haven't figured out Yoda's dying words and neither did the audience I saw it with in 1983). Meanwhile, the evil Empire has built an incomplete Death Star and the Emperor's strength has only gotten stronger. Will the Rebels, including a newly appointed General Solo (!), be able to defeat the Empire and destroy the new Death Star? If you are new to "Star Wars" and have no idea what I am talking about, don't read further.
  
After seeing the Special Edition version years ago, "Return of the Jedi" seemed to be the one that suffered the most from the changes, and it is also the weakest of the three. Firstly, there's an embarrassing sequence redone with CGI effects (and a new song!) in Jabba the Hutt's palace, which looks more like an outtake from a Disney musical. Secondly, I noticed a bizarre trimming of the Ewok celebration at the end - Luke's close-ups in recognition of the spirits of Vader, Kenobi and Yoda seemed to have been cut, and the new Ewok song is less joyful and more of a distraction than anything else (And don't get me started on the unnecessary addition of Hayden Christensen appearing in ghostly form in the 2004 Special Edition version).

Needless to say, the effects in "Jedi" are the best of the three, including the battle on the barge in Tatooine, and the battle on Endor with the flying bikes. Harrison Ford, however, seems stoned out of his mind and less heroic than usual. Ironically, it is Mark Hamill and Carrie Fisher who give the better performances. Luke is more mature and has progressed into a full-fledged Jedi; Leia finally seems to know how to use her laser gun and has one tender scene with Luke; and Chewbacca, C3PO and R2D2 are more annoying than ever. Revelations are aplenty and we finally get to see what Darth Vader really looks like under that mask. The writing suffers when there are brief scenes between Han and Leia: their relationship is undeveloped and mostly results in minor bickering and simple declarations such as Solo having to say "I love you" to Leia when he gave a more appropriate line for a scoundrel in "Empire" that Leia now has to say: "I know." Come on, Lucas - where's the tension? 

"Jedi" is a fun movie and a worthy successor but it is not even half as great as "Empire" and it could have shimmered with improvements in the script department (And why did Lucas approve of those characterless Ewoks who resemble nothing more than teddy bears!) I had hoped that The Phantom Menace would approach the level of the first two Star Wars flicks, but this was not to be. "Phantom Menace" is another guilty pleasure of mine, considering how it is ranked by Star Wars fans below "Jedi." Say it ain't so, Lucas. 

Monday, May 9, 2011

Blair Witch still has the power to frighten

THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT

An introspective analysis of one of the scariest horror films since THE EXORCIST
By Jerry Saravia

WARNING: There are major *spoilers* in here about the film. This page is solely intended for those who have seen the film.


In the thick black forests of the Black Hills in Maryland, it is what you don't see that can kill you.



Heather Donahue as herself in THE BLAIR WITCH PROJECT


Heather: "We will look back on all this and laugh heartily. Believe me."


Michael: "We are making a film about a witch, not about us getting lost."


Josh: "What's your take on the Blair Witch at this point? Do you think she exists?"


Heather (smiling): "I don't know. I don't know."

The first line uttered at the beginning of "The Blair Witch Project" is "It is a little blurry." This is Joshua Leonard's line as he focuses the video camera and zooms out on the instigator of this whole messy enterprise through the woods, Heather Donahue. That line can also apply to the experience of watching "The Blair Witch Project," one of the most original, creative and truly horrific horror films since "The Exorcist." It is the first horror film in quite some time that also manages to blur the lines between reality and fiction in crudely imaginative ways. Its fertile grounds actually share more of a kinship with the landscapes of "The Texas Chainsaw Massacre" and "The Hills Have Eyes," both films that begin and end as nightmarish trips through Dante's Infernal Circles of Hell. Those films left the horror to the imagination and there was some blood and gore, though minimal compared to the slasher flicks of today. The difference is that "Blair Witch Project" has more in common with the horror films of the 30's and 40's in its entirely implicit nature. Basically, there is no gore or blood at all (save for one revealingly graphic moment), no visible monsters or witches, no special-effects or digital manipulation of images. Instead, we are told this story from the point-of-view of the filmmakers and their experiences of finding the Blair Witch. We get noises, shrieks, screams, altercations, and sheer desperation from the characters, aiming to find their way home from the desolate woods where an inescapable evil exists. 
"The Blair Witch Project" begins with Heather Donahue addressing the camera as she gets ready to go on a two-day trip through the Black Hills Forest outside of the town of Burkittsville, Maryland. Joshua Leonard is at her side with the video camera and a CP-16mm black-and-white film camera, and we get a view of Heather's domicile. They already begin shooting as they leave the house, and the film quickly establishes their points-of-view - we are seeing this story as told through the eyes of the protagonists. This is after all existing footage found of the filmmakers after they had disappeared in the woods. Later, they pick up the jocose Michael Williams, the sound recordist, who thanks Heather for the opportunity before saying goodbye to his mother. "Can we see your mom?" asks Heather as she records on her HI-8 camera. They leave hastily. 


The trio begin their day by interviewing the locals in the town of Burkittsville about the Blair Witch. One 20-year-old talks about how his parents used the Blair Witch as a scare tactic against being rowdy in the household. One woman with an irate baby daughter speaks of the Blair Witch while the daughter tries to shut her up, and mentions that she saw a documentary special on the Discovery channel. They find an older resident at a grocery store who speaks of the town's famous 1940's case where a man named Rustin Parr killed several kids in the neighborhood and claimed that the Blair Witch made him do it. Then there is a lunatic woman named Mary Brown (very witch-like in appearance) who claims to have seen the witch at Tappy Creek and remembers how the "black hair on her arms and chest" looked like animal fur, but is unable to come up with any other adjective besides "strange." Afterwards, they visit the town cemetery where many kids were buried, and Heather ominously explains, "There are an unusually high number of children laid to rest here. Most of whom passed in the 1940's yet nobody seems to recall anything unusual at this time, to us anyway. Yet legend tells a different story, which is all around us. Etched in stone." 


After a brief hiatus at a hotel room where they drink scotch and test equipment, the trio begin as they drive to the Black Hills Forest area. Already, the film involves us with some humor to offset the horror to come. As Joshua drives his car, he admits he does not know how to operate the 16mm camera ("It's measured in meters and feet." Heather: "But isn't this an American camera?" Josh: "I've only used it once.") They arrive at the site as Heather tries to carry her heavy backpack (Mike: "I would help you but I would rather record with the camera.") They begin their trek through the woods, leaving Josh's car in an abandoned road. So far, so good. "Wow!" says Josh as he anticipates the long hike ahead. They begin hiking, crossing streams and walking on logs. The first night, they set up their tents and camp. Joshua relays how he feels like the "Captain" of the ship from Gilligan's Island. Mike corrects him as he says, "It is the skipper you illiterate TV people." This is by far the only self-reflective pop culture moment in the entire film. 
The next day, the desperation begins to settle in slowly. Joshua claims he did hear some noise during the night, a kind of cackling. Heather mentions that she slept like a rock, and Michael says he heard nothing and if he did, he would have "shit in his pants." The day begins complete with some off-trail hiking. Heather has the trusty map and the compass, and basically leads the group (Her preparation rests on a couple of hiking books and a text of witch lore seen at the beginning of the film). Mike and Joshua begin to have doubts as they find themselves practically hiking through brushes and twigs and vines. 


Heather (noticing Joshua looking at the map): "It is not necessary to look at the map now. Since I know where we are going. We are going straight through here."



Mike: "If you knew where we were going, we wouldn't be hiking out here-"


Josh: "We're in the middle of the f**in' woods."


Heather: "Some of it...some of it is off-trail hiking."


Joshua: "We are here (pointing to the map). So we should be more or less going this way" (motioning his hand upwards).


Mike (referring to the map): "This looks like Greek to me. It is completely useless."

The three continue on their journey, and it begins to rain. Heather tries to convince them that it will take "two, three hours max" to arrive at their destination. Mike concludes that she made that statement two or three hours earlier. They find an offering of rocks and twigs in a nest settled between two branches. Heather looks at her watch (approximately 4:52pm) and suggests setting up camp since it is getting dark. Everyone is tired and exhausted. That night, noises and shrieks are heard again, and they become louder. Mike gets scared and denies hearing anything, though he records it on DAT tape. Heather asks Joshua to record her investigation on 16mm film. She steps out of the tent looking and yelling, "Hello?" More screams are heard and there is a definite rustling of branches and someone or something stomping on the ground, but we never see anything. 
The next morning, piles of rock formations are found outside their tent - three of them surrounding the area. Heather: "How could we have set up camp between these rocks just by coincidence?" Heather films everything, and the others suggest going back home. Joshua: "We are obviously not wanted here. So let's go. Heather! Stop recording!" They pack up, and then Heather realizes that she lost the map. She accuses Joshua of taking it and he records her on video in a canted angle. He argues that all she wants to do is stick around and film rocks. Mike asks with bemusement: "Did you really lose the map?" Heather tries to be confident when she adds that it is hard to get lost in America nowadays. They begin walking south, but Josh and Mike do not speak to Heather. Finally, after crossing another stream and getting their feet wet, Mike jokingly admits that he threw the map in a creek. Heather and Joshua start pushing him and yelling. "You betrayed us all," shouts Heather. This trip has come to an end and has spurred all kinds of mixed feelings within the group. 
Another night of camping is suggested by Heather despite the rumblings from the others. That night, more noises and shrieks are heard as the trio hides inside the tent. It could be cackling from children, and a baby is heard (possibly the witch's manifestation of such sounds). This culminates in someone or something trying to reach or punch through the tent causing it to shake. Heather and the others escape from the tent and she yells: "What the f*** is that? Oh, my God!" They continue running from the tent, though Heather's shoelaces are untied. They stay up all night, and they never see anything nor do we. In the early morning hours, they discover ominous tree branch formations in the form of a creature with its arms spread out - the twig men. They film everything they see...and slime is found on Josh's belongings. "Josh! Come here! Quick!" cries Heather as she films all the branch-like offerings and symbols, and the others yell at her to continue on hiking south. They wearily continue their trek until they find they are back at the same stream they crossed the previous day. Heather cries, and the others angrily shout "HELP US!" Joshua teaches Heather a lesson in her obsessive filming methods after filming her in close-up and badgering her with the line: "I am out in the middle of the woods. What's my motivation?" Mike calms down everyone. Heather bites and tugs Mike who tries to take the camera away from her. There are the requisite apologies. They decide to sleep in the same tent and calm each other down. 
The next day, Joshua is missing and they try to locate him but he is nowhere to be found. 

Mike: "Maybe he is at the pond."


Heather: No, if he was there, he would've heard me."

After some futile searching, Mike and Heather continue their journey back home. "Where was the Wicked Witch from? East or West"? asks Mike. Heather replies that she was indeed from the west and Mike decides that the best way back is east rather than west. 


That night more sounds are heard...and they do hear Joshua screaming. It is indecipherable but perhaps he is yelling, "Heather! Heather! Help!" (Again, possibly another manifestation of the witch mimicking Josh's voice). They can't find him anywhere in the pitch-black darkness that surrounds them. The next day, she awakens to find Mike is still around, soundly sleeping in the tent. Heather finds an offering of twigs and branches tied together outside the tent. She places them aside and eventually untangles them revealing severed body parts (some say it is actually his teeth or it might be his tongue or a bloody fingernail! Who knows). She screams and the camera turns away. Heather seems to be suffering a mental breakdown, and gets some consolation from Mike. They set up camp again, and Mike asks Heather what she used to do on weekends. "I used to go hiking, but I think those days are over" says the smiling Heather, desperately trying to regain her composure. They continue to travel through the woods and find an abandoned shack where screams are heard, including Josh's. They continue walking through the decrepit shack finding scribblings and children's hand prints on the walls. More screams are heard as they go upstairs and downstairs through the shack, looking and searching. Mike's video camera is knocked over as it falls and focuses on a slimy substance. Where is Mike? The sobbing Heather continues to move through the shack with her 16mm camera...and finally reveals Mike standing on the corner facing the wall. The camera pans quickly and falls...and is left rattling until it runs out of film. Cut to BLACK. 


REVIEW OF THE FILM (Written in 1999)

I first heard about "The Blair Witch Project" back in late 1997 on the show "Split Screen," hosted by guru of independent film, John Pierson. The program showed excerpts from the film, and some outtakes not shown in the final product. Producers from Haxan Films talked about the film and how the footage was found by an anthropology class at Montgomery College in Maryland. The footage is the film we see of the disappearance of three filmmakers who went out into the woods looking for the coveted, enigmatic legend of the Blair Witch. Naturally, the producers spoke about the film as if it really happened. The footage they showed seemed real enough to convince anyone (including "fake" footage of a news channel commenting on their disappearance). Of course, I looked everywhere for some knowledge or facts about the investigation and/or the case and found nothing. I don't believe in witches or goblins or any supernatural beings but it is plausible that three people could have disappeared in the woods without a trace. No records were found anywhere in the Internet or in any news files, but what Haxan did brilliantly was to stir up interest in the film itself. Mr. Pierson may or may not have known at the time if the film was a hoax, but he did pose the question and I have been riveted by the footage and the story ever since. 


Then I heard that the film was screened at the Sundance Film Festival and the Cannes Film Festival and I saw the clever websites, which were receiving as much as 2 million hits a day. I've seen the film twice, once at the Angelika Film Center in New York and at a theatre in New Jersey. What are my feelings now that I've seen one of the most anticipated films of the year? Very positive. "The Blair Witch Project" is one of the best horror films in many howling moons. What is particularly effective about "The Blair Witch Project" is how realistic and authentic the whole film is. It really seems like actual footage found of three people who were to anxious to discover a spooky legend. The fact that most of it is shot on Hi-8 video and on 16mm black-and-white film adds enormously to the authenticity - we believe these people are in jeopardy and thus we become enraptured by their experiences. Video is real enough (operating at 30 frames per second) to make anyone believe that whatever transpires behind the camera is really happening. It is a medium omnipresent on television, from shows like COPS to The Real E.R to most "reality" programming. Video is as close an approximation of reality as we are likely to get from any other medium. 


What is doubly remarkable about "Blair Witch Project" is not only that the story is involving but that we see how the victims, the protagonists of the story, are affected by the unseen evil every step of the way. There isn't a single scene that is not shared by any of the three principal characters. Most horror and slasher films since "Halloween" (1978) centered on the killer and seeing everything from the killer's point-of-view. Michael Myers became a hero for many gore fans, and thus sprang Jason Voorhees, Freddy Krueger and so on. It became a phenomenon that the reason that the targeted audience (mostly teenagers) went to see these films was to see the latest mutilations and creatively bloody executions of the victims, who remained characterless ciphers; for example, the stereotypical naked girls who have sex will die whereas virgins will survive a killer's wrath. There are some exceptions such as "Scream" and its sequels, which did not aim for the same psycho perspective and its characters were at least given some depth. But "Blair Witch" never shows us a witch or anything evil in any physical form. This story is about its victims, pure and simple - the ones trying to survive in the labyrinth they were placed in. And we do care about Heather, Mike and Josh enough to hope they make it out of their surroundings alive. They argue, they are naive, they are unprepared, they fight senselessly, but if we did not care about them or their plight, the horror would never materialize or truly scare or titillate us. That is the cardinal rule of all horror films - to empathize, to identify. Another rule is that the situation or environment has to be credible or plausible to some degree. Many of us may have found ourselves in similar situations as Heather, Josh and Mike have, particularly those of us who've hiked through the woods and been lost or almost lost. 

The performances by the three lead actors are so good that it is impossible to believe that the events are not really happening. Heather Donahue is the controlling leading figure of the film - she guides the group through the woods and gives a brief background of the history of the Blair Witch ("The story is unsettling enough.") She is also too insistent on recording every bit of information she can get a handle on, and at the most inopportune moments. Her obsessive character is very much like Winona Ryder's character Lelaina in "Reality Bites" and Henry Jaglom's directorial alter-ego in "Someone to Love." She changes from controlling and spiteful to shaken and deeply scared by the end of the film Interesting that she switches roles with Mike in terms of leadership). Her final confession to the camera where she apologizes to her parents and to the parents of Josh and Mike is unsettling, emotionally powerful and as humanistic as any horror film ever gets. It is destined to become one of the most memorable and indelible images of human terror ever to be seen in the annals of horror. 


CLOSE-UP of teary-eyed Heather as she peers into the video camera: "I am so...so sorry for everything that's happened. In spite of what Mike says, it is my fault because it is my project. Everything had to be my way. I said we had to go south...and this is where we ended up. It is all because of me that we are hungry, cold...and hunted. (She looks up as she hears noises again) What is that? I am...so scared."

Josh Leonard is the long-haired hippie type whose primary intent at the onset is to have a good time. He does not take anything seriously, until he realizes they are lost and without food or cigarettes. His fear settles in on the third day of their journey when he realizes he will miss work and will be unable to return the camera equipment on time. When Mike complains and cries out for help, Josh can be seen marching past him ready to cry. Everyone suffers a mental breakdown at some point, and he often wanders off by himself and cries trying to regain some composure. 


Mike Williams is the merry prankster, the court jester of the group, who in the end turns out to have the most faith in Heather - they are left to their own wits to get out alive. Mike is skeptical and always in fear and causes the group to lose the path back home when he throws the "useless" map in a creek. In the end, though, he is the most sensible character and grows closer to Heather - she puts her arm around him at one point hoping for relief from the endless terror. 


Contrary to popular belief, "The Blair Witch Project" is not meant to be professionally edited or filmed, and it isn't. If it was polished or if there were smooth transitions, the reality of the horror would not have been so unshakable or disturbing. Remember what the opening titles read: "In 1994, three Montgomery film students went out into the Black Hills woods near Burkittsville, Maryland. A year later, their footage was found." This immediately sets up everything that transpires on screen and it sets forth our identification with the protagonists - we believe every event as it happens to them. Adding to that identification is the fact that the three actors use their own names as the names of the characters. The lines of reality and fiction really start to blur. 
Another complaint about the film is that the hand-held camerawork is often too shaky and disorganized. The same can be said of the Rodney King video - when events are captured in real time and with spontaneity, it is likely to be very shaky particularly on video. Having said that, the hand-held camerawork did not cause me to have motion sickness but it seems to have caused major audience walk-outs. 


With no instrumental music score, special-effects or gimmicks of any kind, "The Blair Witch Project" is as good a horror film as we are likely to see for sometime. It leaves the horror to the imagination, and the tense, nail-biting finale will give you goose bumps for days. Ominous, disturbing, thought-provoking and often scary in retrospect, this film will not exactly entice anyone to go hiking any time soon. 


Friday, May 6, 2011

(An Interview with Robert Davi) A Man of Many Talents

AN INTERVIEW WITH ROBERT DAVI 
(A Man of Many Talents)
By Jerry Saravia

Back in the 1980's, there was one actor who stood out from the plethora of cinematic bad guys and villains - and that was Robert Davi. Davi played the corrupt FBI agent Big Johnson in "Die Hard"; the opera-singing goon in "The Goonies"; the Panamanian drug dealer, Frank Sanchez, one of the most dangerous Bond villains in history, in 1989's "Licence to Kill"; a straight gangster-type in "Cops and Robbersons" which also starred Chevy Chase and Dianne Wiest, amongst other villainous parts. He also played a sleazy owner of the Cheetah's club in the cultish good/bad movie of the 90's, the one and only "Showgirls." But he has shown range in other roles such as his directorial debut, "The Dukes," where he got the chance to sing doo-wop music and play one of the nicest and richest characters he has ever played on screen. Even as the villain du jour, Davi exudes magnetism, sensitivity and a lower-octave when he speaks - he doesn't overplay his roles or reach for the screaming and hollering heights of Robert De Niro or Joe Pesci at their most intensely volatile. Nowadays, aside from appearing in the recent film, "Kill the Irishman," Davi is on tour singing Sinatra songs and has a new upcoming album entitled, "Davi Sings Sinatra: On the Road to Romance." I had the wonderful privilege to interview a man of, indeed, many talents.

1.) I guess it is fair to say that you've been typecast, to some degree, as a bad guy or a mob underworld-type (Lucky Luciano and Donnie Brasco, for starters). Has there been a role, aside from "The Dukes," that you wish you had been cast in, or something you desire to do someday that nobody else has attempted? 

Davi: While most may remember me as the "Bad Guy" --I have played a variety of roles -- Actually staying away from a lot of the typical Stereotypes--in "Christopher Columbus: The Discovery" (1992) with Marlon Brando I played Martin Pinzon - for 4 and a half years on NBC's "Profiler," I was the male lead as FBI Profiler Bailey Malone. There are always roles I wish I had a shot at playing but I never look back -- and there are many different roles I would like to play --- I just scratched the surface - the Best is Yet to Come

2.) I understand you were trained early on as an opera singer. How did you damage your voice?


I was a Baritone with the heart of a Tenor at the time and just pushed too hard too early


3.) I confess, I don't love "Cops and Robbersons" but the scene where you interact with Chevy Chase over rolling a cigar was hysterical as hell. What is the Chevy Chase experience like, and was that scene improvised?

Chevy was great to work with -- and the director Michael Ritchie was a pleasure to work with -- we shaped the scene together and while a lot of times I have down a lot of Improv -- for the most part this scene was as written with a couple of ad libs. 

4.) I would say you have a knack for comedy as well, and I liked your comic timing in "The Dukes," "The Goonies" and "Cops and Robbersons." Have you auditioned or even been considered for a comic role aside from those?


Blake Edwards --in "Son Of the Pink Panther " with Roberto Benigni, but that was a straight offer -- and Blake was fantastic to work with --- I'm saddened I hadn't seen him before he passed just recently - I love Comedy and would like to do more but most do not know my natural affinity for it.

5.) What is your favorite role that you have played, and why?

Haven't done it yet.


6.) I must ask: how did you get the part in "Showgirls?" It is a campy, excessively silly film but I do honestly think you are the best thing in it. 

A meeting with the Director Paul Verhoeven - who I think is terrific!

7.) A friend of mine (thank you, Troy Foote) had a simple question he wanted me to ask you. The hat you wear in "The Goonies" - same hat you wear in "Maniac Cop 2"?

Not the same hat but close in Style --I am a fan of the 40 and 50s film noir ---It's called a Cavanagh hat --- I wore one in "Profiler" as well --- Hats are a Great Accessory--and are gaining in popularity again --- I worn them for 30 years --My Grandfather always wore one and i thought it was so cool


8.) You have worked with Bruce Campbell in "Maniac Cop 2." Goofy guy to work with? 


That wouldn't be the word I would use - he is bright and a very nice fellow


Finally, I love the film "The Dukes." I think you did a great job directing it and interjecting that business about a heist into a comic slice-of-life drama. It is funny, warm and an acutely dramatic film and it all fits. What was it like being in the director's chair, tougher than being in front of the camera?

Thank You - Someone once said "directing is like being pecked to death by ducks" - I loved directing -- the vision begins and ends with you -- so it is very satisfying --I have alway looked at films not just as an actor but from a directorial point of view working with some of the best in the business doesn't hurt -so I was ready --- also Surrounding yourself with talented people is imperative!!!!

Thursday, May 5, 2011

First Great Good/Bad Movies Ever Made

GLEN OR GLENDA (1953) and PLAN NINE FROM OUTER SPACE (1956) 
Reviewed by Jerry Saravia


"Glen or Glenda" and "Plan Nine from Outer Space" are the quintessential Ed Wood movies - seemingly empty, stupid and, above all, hilariously bad. Ed Wood, the director, made the films on excessively low-budgets and it shows. For example, with "Plan Nine," the lighting is poor and inconsistent (as it was in most of his flicks), there are continuity problems throughout (night and day settings mix interchangably), the acting is nonexistent, and the sets and dialogue are probably as threadbare and absurd as you might expect from a grade-Z flick (check out those paper plates masquerading as flying saucers). And the movie is so bad (and proud of it, too) that it works and is worth seeing because it is never boring. The humor though unintentional brings it a certain charm that makes most of the tepid monster/sci-fi flicks of the time unwatchable.


This was Bela Lugosi's last role yet what we see are remnants of a performance - he cries at a funeral for Vampira (!) and is seen traipsing through a forest area with a black cape in what looks like a remake of Dracula. These are outtakes hilariously repeated throughout the film, and to bridge the gap for the missing scenes, Ed hired a chiropractor to play Bela's role wearing a cape which he covers his mouth with! These feeble attempts at fashioning a film around a film star's death is not unlike the similarly assembled footage of Bruce Lee in "Game of Death."


Whether or not Ed intended this film to be as bad as it is, or to be recognized as it is now (the worst film ever made) is besides the point, it has gained cult status and has even been made into a Broadway musical and inspired a sequel! The movie is famous enough to have driven director Tim Burton to make a fabulous film about the man himself. "Plan Nine" is the kind of movie where listening to the dialogue makes it a sheerly pleasurable experience (though the finale where an alien makes a speech about how we, the puny humans "are stupid, stupid, stupid" actually is actually smartly written). 


And how can one forget the idiocy and sheerly hysterical innuendoes of "Glen or Glenda" (1953), a truly bad film but far funnier than "Plan Nine." The film purports to be an essay on the issues and myths of transvestism of the 1950's (originally the film was to be based on the headlined Christine Jorgensen story of that time). Ed Wood plays a man who harbors a fetish for angora and for women's clothing. His girlfriend (Dolores Fuller) is unaware of his behavior but grows suspicious. And to top it all off, we have buffalo roaming the countryside in some shots, inexplicable scenes of steel factories with voice-over narration, discussions on sexual orientation, endless dream sequences, Ed dressed in various styles of women's clothes, Bela Lugosi as a demon or devil (or as himself possibly) watching over all the denizens of the city of L.A. making remarks such as "Watch out for the little dragon that sits at your doorstep. He eats little boys. Puppy dog tails, and big fat snails! Bevare! Take care!"


None of it makes a lick of sense, but it is a hoot and a half to watch it and you'll admire Ed for making a very personal film in a time when such topics were considered taboo. A classic, in every sense of the word. Watch it with the lights out! 


I have not seen all of Ed Wood's flicks but I do admire the man's passion (and penchant for single takes, something even John Huston was known for). Ed Wood's movies will last whereas purely bad cinematic turds like "Robot Monster" won't. 

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

SAG's McCarthyism on a Stuntwoman

Screen Actor's Guild's McCarthyism on a Stuntwoman
By Jerry Saravia



Leslie Hoffman and Ricardo Montalban in The Naked Gun

Women never get treated fairly in the workforce, a Federal Government known fact. Stuntwomen get treated even worse while the Federal Government, the Producers and the Screen Actors Guild turn a blind eye towards this situation. Still, nobody has been treated with as much malignance as stuntwoman Leslie Hoffman, who has been blacklisted by SAG through its past Members of the Board of Directors, including certain stuntmen who, as stunt coordinators, hire the stuntpeople and the Producers. 

I've known Hoffman on the silver screen, as I am sure many Horror Fans do, from her brief cameo in "A Nightmare on Elm Street," the 1984 horror classic by director Wes Craven. She played a High School Guard, who is actually Freddy Krueger as she taunts Nancy (Heather Langenkamp) in a dream sequence with the words, "Hey Nancy, No running in the hallway." Actually, Leslie Hoffman has also had a long run in the movie business as a stuntwoman and stunt coordinator; performing stunts on T.V. series such as "Star Trek: Deep Space Nine" & "Voyager," "M*A*S*H," "Emergency," "The Love Boat," "Remington Steele," and many others. Film credits include everything from 1976's "Two-Minute Warning" (her first union job that allowed her to join SAG) to "The Naked Gun" where she did a stunt doubling for Queen Elizabeth. 

All these early credits enabled Leslie to become the first Stuntwoman to be elected to the Hollywood Board of Directors of SAG (1981-1985), as well as the first Stuntwoman elected to the AFTRA Local Board and AFTRA National Board. It was with the AFTRA National Board where she and Board Member Howard Caine convinced them to create the category of Stuntperson. These titles, unfortunately, came with more handicaps than perks. From the first day that Leslie was elected to the SAG Board of Directors position, she was vilified, lied to and made to seem as if she couldn't handle the job single-handedly. This was mainly due to her gender, thus she became BLACKLISTED. "Due to the stuntman who was finishing out his term, spreading vicious rumors about me, it seriously compromised my ability to work with the Board of Directors because many of them tainted me. A stuntman was brought in to 'complement me and to help me do my job', which is normally handled by one person," said Leslie during our phone interview. Edward Asner, an actor and liberal activist (best known for playing Lou Grant), was President of SAG from 1981-1985 and did little to help Leslie at all. In fact, "He sided with the stuntmen, conveniently stopping me from helping Stuntwomen and Stuntpeople of Color," said Leslie. "As well as making sure actors were kept safe.“

Leslie Hoffman did her job too well, or maybe a woman doing this job is not what SAG had in mind. What is troubling is that she was elected by the SAG Membership and the Nominating Committee had chosen her as well. What did the Nominating Committee have in mind when they nominated her? Perhaps, the fact that Leslie looked after and spoke out on stunts performed by everyone, not just stunt groups but also People of Color, children and independent stuntpeople, as well as actors. For example, shortly after the "Twilight Zone: The Movie" tragedy that resulted in the deaths of two Non-Union children working past certain designated hours and actor Vic Morrow, Leslie was sent to Sacramento to testify in changing the Child Labor Laws. The California State Attorney wanted a new "Twilight Zone" Law passed that would say “children cannot be near any rotors." Leslie pointed out that it should be specific to helicopters since rotors exist in cars, hair dryers, etc. Considering Leslie was the Chairwoman of the National Stunt and Safety Committee and the Co-Chair of the Young Performers Committee, her expertise in this area of stunts should not have come as a surprise. Yet when it came to Contract Negotiations, the Executive Board went outside the norm by not sending the SAG Director to New York - instead they sent a Caucasian Stuntman.

The truth is that a certain stunt group promoted by SAG did not want Leslie to speak out on anything but stunts. Since Leslie could not be a member of the male-only group, it was an easier to remove her. Rumors were spread among this group and other parts of the stunt community that Leslie had voted against everything this certain stunt group wanted. "If Leslie likes the things that have been going for her with work, she should keep on being Asner’s little girl. Maybe she’s not planning on being a stuntwoman anymore, maybe she’s going to be an actress and then Ed can get her jobs,” explains Leslie. A stuntman dictated these words to the SAG Board Member, who was standing next to Leslie from this stunt group. Asner was made aware of this assault towards Leslie in a letter written by this Board Member, and Asner sided with the stuntmen. This discrimination continued on to the end of Leslie Hoffman's career by certain Stunt Coordinators who never hired her again. This was not due to her lack of professionalism or knowledge in the area of stunts. Her crime was that she was a woman in a male-dominated field.

Such discrimination does not come as a shock to some (though it may to some readers), especially in Hollywood and in an organization like SAG. Consider these facts - SAG contracts for actors often eclipse actresses by more than half. For example, in 1997, SAG contracts for actresses exceeded by 472 million whereas for actors, it exceeded 928 million. This would mean discrimination is alive and well and the Producers and the SAG headquarters do little to stop it. An interesting fact is that since the EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) of 1964 stipulated that any Company that received funds from the Federal Government is supposed to investigate any discriminatory acts and correct them. Therefore, the Producers are violating Federal Government rules. Also the Producers and SAG since (at least) 1977 have the following “so-called" affirmative action clause in their contract that stipulates, “When applicable and with due regards to safety, women can double for women and minorities can double for minorities.”  This is clearly a statement that a Caucasian Stunt Coordinator must qualify Women and People of Color, but nowhere will one find, in the Codified Contract, that a Caucasian Stuntman must be qualified!  This also makes it harder for a Stuntwomen or Stuntperson of Color to advance to the position of Stunt Coordinator.
  
After 35 years of performing stunts on Big Screen and on Television, Leslie Hoffman started to suffer aches in her neck and her back and some possible mild brain injuries or concussions, primarily from all the falls and fights she performed. First, she filed a Workman’s Comp claim based on Continuous Trauma, and then for Social Security. However, the straw that broke the camel's back came when in 2003, Leslie had the symptoms of post-concussion syndrome, which include lack of sleep, aches, depression and a finally a nervous breakdown.

Leslie Hoffman was awarded a settlement in the Workman’s Comp and was considered permanently disabled by the Federal Government so she received SSI, which in turn led to SAG giving Leslie her SAG Pension that she was entitled to for her various years as a stuntwoman. Yet SAG denied her the Disability Health Plan, a well-hidden clause in the Producer-SAG Health Pamphlet that stipulates that SAG members who suffer a career-ending injury while working on the set are entitled to health benefits. SAG denied her health benefits and she has been forced to file a lawsuit against the Plan under the ERISA Act (Employee Retirement Security Act). She has been grossly overpaying on a Health Plan, RX Plan and Dental insurance from different Companies while waiting for the result of the ERISA Lawsuit.

According to Leslie, in July of 2010, an appeal board of no less than 75 people (some were in attendance via satellite uplink) were present to discuss Leslie's Health Plan and if she should receive it. "It was more like an Inquisition," said Leslie. Three of the SAG Trustees shared a past with Leslie. Six were ex-SAG Board Members, one being the Vice President for two of the four years that Leslie served and the other member was an Alternate to the Executive Board. Finally the third member was the stuntman from the 1980's whom the Executive Board sent instead of the Stunt Board Member, and there was a medical expert hired by the Producer-SAG Health Plan. When asked by the medical expert about the paper she had brought in, Leslie had stated that she had certain symptoms from Post-Concussion-Syndrome but that she was not a qualified doctor. This doctor's response to her and the room about Post Concussion Syndrome was a declarative "NO!" followed by a vile laugh (keep in mind, this doctor never examined Leslie). The stuntman, who is clearly not a practitioner of medicine, let out this doozy – “Knowing that you have Congenital Scoliosis, maybe you should have never been a Stunt Woman." Leslie did not have Congenital Scoliosis and had recent MRIs and a Bone Scan to prove it.

Suffice to say, Leslie Hoffman is clearly the victim of a Hate Crime and has been blacklisted by SAG (her last job was as stunt coordinator for a "Star Trek" fan film entitled "Starship Farragut"). Though she is a veteran stuntwoman and an Advocate for all, her own price to pay for her art is being female in an actively though not exclusively male profession, populated by several stuntwomen who never get enough of the credit they deserve. Leslie has tried to tell her story to the NAACP, NOW and ACLU, not to mention various magazines, radio shows and newspapers, and all of them showed no interest whatsoever. Leslie has recently fought for other stuntmen and a woman who were entitled to the SAG Disability Health Plan - she was able to obtain for them reimbursement and disability health plans they might otherwise have not received. Leslie was also featured in an article on another issue that SAG, the Producers and the Health Plan will not address, which is that FICA (Social Security and Medicare) should not be taken out of residuals (“Disabled Workers of the World Unite!” is the article that explains in detail about residuals at http://www.hollywoodtoday.net/2010/11/03/disabled-workers-of-the-world-unite/ ) The irony is that the stuntpeople whom she has helped received their Health plan or reimbursement without having to go through the Appeal Board, whereas Leslie had to. This is clearly retaliation for her Advocacy of more than 30 years. Ever the resilient fighter for justice, Leslie Hoffman is a voice that needs to be heard and reckoned with, for the good of all Members of the Screen Actors Guild. No deaf ears in her hallway, please.  

Saturday, April 30, 2011

The Sharon Tate Murder: Waters-style


MULTIPLE MANIACS (1970)
Reviewed by Jerry Saravia (Originally written in 2003)
I recently watched one of John Waters's first films, "Multiple Maniacs," and all I can say is: he may have bad taste but he sure is funny. "Multiple Maniacs" may be well my favorite John Waters film by far, a film that aims low and delivers high notes. It is a gross-out comedy but not in the same vein as today's equivalents, and it is certainly not as putrid as "Pink Flamingos." I sense Waters is having fun here without getting mired in tastelessness or mean-spiritedness.
The film stars Divine as herself, as she is the queen attraction of something called "The Calvacade of Perversions." These so-called perversions, which include two gay men kissing, a man known as the "puke eater" and other indecent acts, are introduced by Divine's boyfriend, the late David Lochary. He stands outside a tent overlooking suburbia with a microphone and invites people in these tents to see the perversions for free. All the people are shocked by what they see yet they can't stop looking (one even comments about a fat woman's hairy body). Divine is quite an attraction already, but she wants nothing more than to rob and kill people! She claims responsibility for Sharon Tate's death and for having scribbled the word "PIG" with her bloody fingers. David is understandably shocked since he has no memory of ever killing Sharon Tate.
The paper-thin plot has David having an affair with a wannabe blonde perversion named Bonnie (Mary Vivian Pearce). Meanwhile, Divine has a fling with a lesbian (Mink Stole) inside a church! Here is where we are privy to the "Rosary" sequence that is as revolting and sacrilegious as you can imagine. I do not have go into details but this is a scene that must be seen to be believed. When Divine catches wind of David's affair, she prepares to kill with utmost relish. And before the end of the film, we are treated for yet another infamous sequence involving Divine getting raped by a lobster!
Now then, how the heck can I recommend such garbage? Well, quite simple really. "Multiple Maniacs" is crude and irreverent and it knows it, and makes no apologies for it. I found this film funnier and more personal than "Pink Flamingos," and I think Waters lost his edge ever since this cult classic and "Flamingos." Today, Waters could scarcely do anything to offend or shock people unless he found something personal to say, albeit with the religious iconography of his upbringing and the late, great Divine. Other merits are the choice of rock and roll music on the soundtrack (including Elvis's "Jailhouse Rock"), and choice excerpts from Gustav Holst's "The Planets." Any film that ends with "God Bless America" while Divine preens and struts her stuff is worthwhile in my book. Divine is simply charming and suitably creepy at the same time. Kudos also go to Cookie, Divine's daughter (played by the late Cookie Mueller who walks around naked in her apartment) and her boyfriend who despises David (their conversations are hysterical).
What separates this mondo trash from other trash films of the period is its compassion. Waters is willing to listen to these perverts and see them as people, not as caricatures. Consider the scene where David is making love to Bonnie and discusses getting away from Divine. There is a touch of humanity here that makes it all worthwhile, and you actually feel sorry for David.
Yes, "Multiple Maniacs" is badly shot and composed with a horrendous number of overexposed shots. There are also numerous jump cuts and largely asynchronous sound (I think Waters was still learning how to edit). The film was shot for $5,000 in grainy stock black-and-white film, and it shows but so what. Jump cuts do not bother me, nor does asynchronous sound (both have become part of film grammar). What is most hilarious is seeing Divine parading around the town of Baltimore, carrying all her weight around and stepping into trouble every step of the way. Disgusting? Perverted? Yes, it is all those things. And damn funny too.

Saturday, April 23, 2011

The Greatest Music Video Ever Made

SCORPIO RISING (1964)
Reviewed by Jerry Saravia
(On my top ten list of greatest films ever made)
Kenneth Anger's "Scorpio Rising" is one of the most revolutionary films of the past fifty years. It set a whole new precedent for filmmaking in general, in terms of its fast-cutting style, rock n' roll music montages, rebellious allure of motorcyclists, sex, death, and so on. In fact, I may be so bold as to say that this is the first sex, drugs and rock n' roll movie ever made. And Anger did it all in less than half-an-hour of film time.
As director Anger recently explained (in an interview with Professor Kinema on his cable access show) about his most famous (or infamous) short film, "Scorpio Rising" is an ironic take on "The Wild One," the latter being a fairly tame motorcycle movie next to this one. In fact, "Scorpio Rising" is all about irony, and yet it says something rather disconcerting about the world in America before the love generation and the decadence of the 1970's set in. At times, "Scorpio Rising" seems to be an ironic take on the 1950's yet commenting on the growing motorcycle cult of the late 1960's. Anger even dedicated the film to the Hell's Angels.

"Scorpio Rising" begins with average men in their late teens or early twenties polishing and fixing their precious bikes (or as Anger referred to them as "Christmas tree versions of motorcycles".) The men are inside their garages, and we hear lovely pop songs in the background as the camera tracks back and forth between the bikers and their bikes, wind-up toys of motorbikes, and a prominent visage of a skull in the background. Later, we see the bikers dressing up in their uniforms, a combination of leather jackets and straps to the tune of Bobby Vinton's "Blue Velvet" (long before this version become iconized with David Lynch's film). The irony begins again, as the song has the lyric, "She wore blue velvet," yet we see a blonde biker dressing up in a blue shirt and a black leather jacket. As photographed in close-up, along with subliminal shots of a barechested biker, there is a definite homoerotic subtext occurring here (unintended by Anger), as there was with Anger's first film "Fireworks" where Anger played a 17-year-old kid who dreams of being sodomized and beaten by Navy officers. There is one shot in "Scorpio" of the barechested biker standing over a cone pointing to his crotch. Most of "Scorpio Rising" has sexual connotations in every shot, especially the Halloween party where costumed, masked guests stand around mimicking sexual gestures, though not with their genitalia clearly exposed as I had initially thought (the version I saw had such moments seemingly blotted out since it was a copy of a copy from a Japanese laserdisc).

"Scorpio Rising" combines elements of teen rebellion, popular culture, Nazi ideology, the motorcycle cult, sex, rock n' roll, religion, and death and it twists such elements around to form a rather haunting collage about the inevitable decline of the western civilization as we know it. And every sequence has a rock and roll song or some sentimental ditty playing on the soundtrack. "Scorpio Rising" is the first film to ever build a montage of shots with songs, and to do so ironically. If you are wondering where Martin Scorsese, Quentin Tarantino, Paul Thomas Anderson, Wes Anderson and any filmmaker since, not to mention MTV, got their ideas for their famous use of ironic pop songs as subtext or montage, look no further back than "Scorpio Rising." Another ironic fact is that the film was brought up on obscenity charges back in 1964, yet no one noticed the use of songs in the soundtrack which Anger had no permission to use. Since then, the film has been tough to find in video stores because the rights to such songs are still in a legal tangle. (UPDATE: Apparently, the use of the songs was licensed by Anger by way of an attorney and it cost Anger $8,000. On video and Japanese laserdisc, the legal tangle may have been initiated, as is the case with most films with songs in their soundtracks, i.e. "Yellow Submarine"). 

"Scorpio Rising" is a frenetically charged, highly potent piece of cinema and it is guaranteed to still provoke anger (especially the use of the swastika symbol). It was a sign of things to come, long before the advent of the post-60's youth rebellion in films such as "The Graduate," or youth violence in "A Clockwork Orange." There is of course the nineties equivalent of both in "Natural Born Killers." It all began with Anger's film, and we can either be grateful or unforgiving.