Wednesday, August 10, 2022

Someone Punch Me Now

 LOOSE SHOES (1980)
Reviewed by Jerry Saravia

You know you are in trouble when the DVD cover of a movie trailer parody featuring positive quotes from "A Friend in the Family" is funnier than anything in the movie. And by the way, the quotes are about as simplistic as you can imagine and they include howlers such as "Loose Shoes is a Must See" and "Truly Inspired Skits." Yeah, they gave me a smile across my face that lasted half a second. I wish someone had punched me in the face before I even loaded this DVD into the player and reminded me not to bother. Or I wish someone convinced me not to buy it for a dollar at the Dollar Store years ago as it sat here waiting, or daring me, to watch it. I am glad I never saw this in a theater. Anyway, let's get back to the movie. 

"Loose Shoes" is a bunch of faux movie trailers strung together and they are of the scatological nature like "Howard the Huge" (a takeoff on Howard Hughes) and a series of short teasers for "That's Sexploitation!" Otherwise we get such preciously awful ones like "Skateboarders From Hell" (which is so horrendously staged that it is hard to figure if they are imitating the bad Drive-In flicks of the 70's or if the filmmakers were clueless); a talking pig that goes on for far too long; a cumbersome trailer featuring Buddy Hackett and a school for teaching children to stop tinkling outside; a takeoff on Chaplin with a Tramp-like character called "The Bum" which somehow equates Jewish with being Communist (Oh, I am doubling over with laughter), and even Bill Murray wearing heavy eyebrow liner as a prisoner which is good for a chuckle or two. Most of these seem more like extended skits rather than trailers and none would have made it on the air on Saturday Night Live back then.

The best segment has a Woody Allen-like parody of his "Play it Again, Sam" film and the actor perfectly captures Woody's mannerisms and inflection. The worst might be "Darktown after Dark" which is cringeworthy at best with a repeated refrain for a big band song and I'll leave it at that. "Loose Shoes" (originally titled "Coming Attractions") has nothing really of value and no real attitude towards the material it parodies. A parody of Billy Jack called Billy Jerk with him going to Oz doesn't exactly scream Ernst Lubitsch or the ZAZ team. 

Footnote: Apparently the DVD has almost forty minutes of black screen after the movie is over and reportedly so does the VHS version. Now that's funny. 

Tuesday, August 9, 2022

Watch the skies and that cloud

 NOPE (2022)
Reviewed by Jerry Saravia

I've only seen one other Jordan Peele horror flick and that was "Get Out," which was a considerable improvement over most horror films during the 2010 era. "Get Out" had a purpose and a deliberate emphasis on what lies skin deep in our society with regards to racism. "Nope" is one of the strangest sci-fi horror pictures I've seen in many moons though I am not sure it is any deeper than "Get Out" but I'll accept what is on the surface as surprisingly absorbing.

The film begins with a shocking image of a bloodied chimpanzee who has presumably killed a woman laying on the ground (it turns out the woman survived). The chimp is Gordy and it is part of some TV program where something went terribly wrong. Right then you might assume you walked in to the wrong movie theater but wait. Cut to a horse ranch owned by Otis "OJ" Haywood Jr. (Daniel Kaluuya) and Emerald "Em" Haywood (Keke Palmer, the brightest spot of this movie) who rent out their horses for TV and film productions. When their horse gets startled during rehearsal, the Haywoods are let go and money thus proves to be tight which means selling their horses is their only monetary salvation. One night, the power goes out at their ranch as Em dances to an LP on stereo (oh, I love these people already) and Otis notices a flying disc in the clouds, not to mention lights that go on and off on the other side of his property. Of course those lights are part of a fun little Western theme park called "Jupiter's Claim," owned by Jupe (Steven Yeun) who was one of the kids that witnessed the violent Gordy the chimp back in 1998. Jupe, by the way, not only wants to buy a horse from Otis, he wants the ranch as well.

"Nope" is the type of sci-fi horror that builds slowly and you are not sure where it is headed. At first, the lights from the theme park struck me as an alien presence when in fact they are not. The UFO is actually not a ship, it is a monster with deep digestible tube in its portal. The objects from the sky that kill Otis's father (the always welcome Keith David) are from that UFO and they include silver coins and keys and other items, though at first you are not sure what is coming out of the sky. Once we notice this UFO monster is not a flying disc, then we know trouble is brewing as it resembles some huge weather balloon (unintended reference perhaps to the Roswell incident of 1947). This monster hides behind a motionless cloud and even after you are aware it is an alien presence, I wondered if Jordan Peele was about to drag the rug from under us and reveal some M. Night Shyamalan twist. Thankfully, that is not the case.

"Nope" is leisurely horror and its sci-fi elements are used sparingly (we don't why this alien is territorial and what its purpose is). It may confound many why this movie is nearly over two hours long but that hardly bothered me because I cared about the Haywood siblings and their unexpected goings-on. Daniel Kaluuya plays it so straight as OJ (funny use of those initials) and so unemotional, as if a UFO is the last thing that will intrude upon his life. I was also a little put off by Kaluuya's almost robotic performance yet I got used to it - one surmises that OJ has had his share of troubles in life already. Keke Palmer is fully alive as Em, a sprightly woman who wants to live and push beyond her boundaries. She feels restricted at this ranch yet feels inclined to help her brother out - they look out for each other. Also worth noting is the nosy electronics store clerk (Brandon Perea) who installs surveillance cameras at the ranch and knows instantly that it has to do with aliens! Well, gee, why else would you want surveillance cameras pointed upward? Perea provides some measure of comic relief during "Nope's" many solemn moments. Kudos to the underrated Michael Wincott as a famous cinematographer who wants to capture the UFO with an IMAX film camera. He also dabbles in footage of animal predators, which lends itself to the underlying theme of the movie - never look directly at a predator's eyes.  

Somewhere between being an homage to "Close Encounters of the Third Kind" with a dash of the impending terror pounding sounds of Spielberg's "War of the Worlds" and "Jurassic Park," "Nope" is mostly successful at being spooky and captivating and there are a few scares here and there. After it was over, I began looking at the clouds in the sky and hoped there wasn't one immobile cloud. "Nope" has that curious effect - it sneaks up on you and makes the hairs on the back of your neck stand up.     

Monday, August 8, 2022

Olivia Newton-John's Heart Says Don't Let Go

 OLIVIA NEWTON-JOHN IN GREASE
A Remembrance by Jerry Saravia

"Grease" is the most popular musical of the 1970's and I am sure it has gained more popularity since (the movie was also re-released in a sing-along version in theaters). The movie will stay with me as the ideal musical romantic comedy with the perfectly cast John Travolta and the sweet, lovely, winsome Olivia Newton-John as the lovely couple. John Travolta's Danny Zuko is one of the leather-jacketed, 1950's bad boys whose pride is always in check and it is hard to forget Travolta's performance that, in repeated viewings, is actually wittier than I had thought. Ultimately, it is really Olivia Newton-John whom we gravitate to the most as the Australian teenage Sandy Olsson who meets and falls in love with Danny. Of course, when Sandy is admitted to Rydell High, Danny acts like he doesn't know her because his T-Bird greaser gang don't believe in love, only making out. 

"Grease" is an upbeat, revved-up musical but it is not among my favorites in this genre. The ending doesn't quite work which falls into something more fanciful with a fairy-tale touch than what preceded it. Still, I love the music, the expertly-timed dancing and the songs are memorable (especially more memorable than anything in "Grease 2"), and my favorite song and dance number might easily be the rousing number "Greased Lightnin." My favorite of the supporting characters is easily Stockard Channing as Betty Rizzo who chews more gum than I ever did in all my high school years combined. Of course, it goes without saying that Travolta and Newton-John are a dynamic pair and sizzle - who else could do these roles better?

I do have a special fondness for the best scene in the film and it involves Olivia singing the Oscar-nominated "Hopeless Devoted To You." It is sung beautifully as we follow Sandy walking around the community at night singing her heart out to Danny whom we see in a reflection in an inflatable pool of water. It is sad and wistful and just so lovingly performed that you can't help but hope Sandy finds love with Danny. That is the ultimate effect of this deliberately old-fashioned musical and that is the long-lasting effect Olivia Newton-John has left us as well. Rest in Peace, you beautiful spirit.

Highway To the Danger Zone again

 TOP GUN: MAVERICK (2022)
Reviewed by Jerry Saravia

It is not a surprise for any of my regular readers to learn that 1986's "Top Gun" is not a film I love or loathe - to me, it was nothing more than a jingoistic war picture not unlike "Rambo: First Blood Part II" that was released the year earlier. "Top Gun" is a film I instantly forgot to the point that my best friend at the time had to remind me that we saw it. Cut to 36 years later and we got a sequel I thought nobody wanted but I've found that I am wrong about many things. "Top Gun: Maverick" is actually a decent popcorn flick that doesn't seem to be a recruitment film like the original, though I am not sure it will dissuade anyone from joining the Navy. In 1986, it was the startling image of Kelly McGillis who was instrumental in getting young guys to join the Navy. In 2022, it could be Jennifer Connelly but I have not seen the latest Navy recruitment numbers.

Tom Cruise is back as Maverick, not aging too much since those happy-go-lucky days. He is still Captain and never rose in the ranks, and for many he is a killjoy - a top-flight F-18 pilot who can zoom in and out of the sky like nobody's business but is hardly in step with the chain of command. Right at the start of the film, Maverick is already in trouble as he disobeys an order to pilot a supersonic jet from the "Darkstar" program that shows him going at speeds too fast even for Chuck Yeager. The jet is destroyed when he pushes the pedal to the metal. Maverick is told that he is a relic of the past - drones will take over and jets will no longer need pilots. So instead Maverick will be back in the TOPGUN program teaching the best fighter pilots on Earth how to evade radar and destroy a uranium plant while flying low-level in canyons surrounding the target. Sounds like an impossible mission, right? Maverick doesn't think so yet he is, initially, not allowed to go on this mission.

When "Top Gun: Maverick" really works our nerves, it is with the aerial footage which is truly extraordinary and keeps you on your toes. We are right there with the pilots and their efforts to swing the jets up and over cliffs shows how much strain and pain it can cause them. When the movie is on ground level, it sputters a little especially in the beginning. Jennifer Connelly has a magnetism unmatched on the screen and I wish her role was more a supervisory Navy officer rather than some gal owning a bar who used to date Maverick (McGillis played a flight instructor in the original). Connelly looks far too glamorous to own a bar but then I remembered this is "Top Gun," not "Born on the Fourth of July." This whole movie is a boy's own adrenalized fantasy of fighting a war that just incorporates destroying one singular target spot (which made me think of the Death Star's own small portal where a couple of laser strikes was all that was required) and becoming triumphant. 

Though not all the interactions in the film work, some do stick out. I like Miles Teller playing LT Bradley "Rooster" Bradshaw, wearing shades and singing "Great Balls of Fire" like his dad that passed on in the first film (Rooster's dad was played by Anthony Edwards in the original). I also liked the braggadocious Hangman (Glen Powell), more than likely modeled on the Iceman from the original. And it was the butter on the popcorn delight to see Val Kilmer back as an ailing Iceman - it is short and powerful and one wishes more time was spent on Kilmer. As for the other recruits, they are hardly memorable if only because their dialogue is simply about who's the better pilot as they one-up each other.

For an undistinguished, glorious look at war where the enemies are faceless, "Top Gun: Maverick" will fit the bill just like those old-fashioned war movies of the 40's and 50's. It is entertaining to be sure and the climax thrives on pure adrenaline. You might forget most of the movie after it is over, but it is hard to forget the image of Tom Cruise and those gleaming choppers as he's riding a motorcycle through an air field - a nostalgic 1980's kick in the pants.  

Monday, July 25, 2022

Watch a B-movie from "Something Weird" instead

 FILM HOUSE FEVER (1986)
Reviewed by Jerry Saravia

A curio is a curio until it ceases being a curio and becomes a something of a rarefied piece of junk. Such is the case with "Film House Fever" which is nothing short of an empty void filled with some sort of stench.

Steve Buscemi and Mark Boone Junior (both friends in real life) play B-movie junk food aficionados who watch movies on three TV's! This is all they apparently do and Mark Boone seems to be the one that becomes a zombie for watching too many movies. They hear of a "from Dusk till Dawn" film festival which only seems to show trailers and short segments of B-movies and grade Z zilch (this is an all-night film festival?)  Then it turns out the theater is inhabited by actual zombies who attack our two so-called movie snobs. That's all folks.

Amateurish to a fault and unwatchable from beginning to end, it resembles something cobbled together if you spent time with friends on a weekend shooting a movie on 16mm and editing it the same weekend at a non-profit TV station (nothing wrong with that because I've done it myself). At 58 minutes though, it feels 5 hours too long. It is great to see early "performances" by Steve Buscemi and Mark Boone Junior yet that is its only novelty. "Film House Fever" is best forgotten like any piece of grade Z junk.

Strictly the King of Rock and Roll

 ELVIS (2022)
Reviewed by Jerry Saravia

Baz Luhrmann's "Elvis" is a 24-carat, gold-studded, immensely entertaining knockout of a rock and roll movie musical. There have been other film adaptations of Elvis Presley's life but this one offers more personal touches and gets deeper, especially the relationship between him and Colonel Tom Parker. 

I have to say that while watching the first half-hour of "Elvis," I felt I was being contained and thrown around through a barrage of images that dissolve in and out of each other - basically, I felt cut out of the movie. I love Luhrmann's "Moulin Rouge" which was itself a montage movie musical where no shot lasted longer than 3 seconds. I was praying that Luhrmann was not going for that headache-inducing approach which would, I originally thought, not work for someone like Elvis - it could threaten any emotional investment you might have in any character. After a while, though, I was carried along by it because the musical influences on Elvis and the discovery of Elvis as a new singer to contend with kept me happily hooked and I stopped feeling like I was being jerked around from one corner of the frame to the other. 

Austin Butler plays Elvis, through the 1950's up until his death, and I first thought he looked nothing like Elvis - Butler looks more like Val Kilmer channeling Elvis. But, once again, even if the looks are a tad dissimilar, the most important aspect is that Butler captures the swagger and  no-frills attitude of Elvis. There are moments where time stands still, as in Presley's attempt to sing on stage during the Hank Snow tour. The audience waits, the silence creeps in, and then Elvis starts singing - it is a cliched moment in musical biopics but it still works. He gyrates, vibrates his hips and makes the women go crazy screaming - he's a sexual animal using every muscle below his torso to engineer excitement for the audience and for himself. Elvis's mother is also in attendance and she is more than nonplussed by this, not to mention his strict, money-hungry manager Col. Parker (Tom Hanks, an atypical performance). After Elvis gets permission to sing by having his parents sign the contract (Elvis was still a minor at this point), the world discovers that the man with rock and roll swagger can sing and transport the audience in ways nobody imagined (many at the time, including Parker before he met the King, thought Elvis was black). That swagger and his gyrations were too hot for TV at the time, so Elvis had to dial it down. He had to dial down so much that he was drafted into the Army and was stationed in Germany where he met Priscilla Presley (the reasons he was inducted are not all accurate but it was a method per Parker to illustrate the King as a good old American boy with a crewcut). The rest is history, and his death was far too premature due to imbibing alcohol and every drug prescribed to him under the sun during his Vegas years.

"Elvis" does have its faults, especially in including Elvis' songs performed by others on the soundtrack during Elvis' prime years (to be clear, these play on the soundtrack and not while he's singing). Those cover songs feel like an intrusion though I do love the depiction of black rhythm and blue guitarists and the gospel singers from Tupelo in Elvis's younger years - you can see how young blonde Elvis is immediately entranced and influenced by them (in a church, he seems to collapse in their arms as if possessed which adds to his later Vegas performances where he is similarly possessed). Another issue is that Priscilla Presley (Olivia DeJonge) is introduced as a young girl he dates (though you wouldn't know it from watching that she was in reality a fan) and then, presto, she's his wife and then she disappears for a little while, shows up to calm Elvis during the news of political assassinations, then she is a regular in the audience showing emotional support, and then they get divorced. The movie skims their relationship unlike Elvis' love and affection for his mother (exceedingly well-cast Helen Thomson) - what I love about the mother is she's shown as someone who believes in her famous son despite his wiggle and his energetic gyrations (" The way you sing is God-given, so there can't be nothin' wrong with it."). Of course, we can't have everything when we have an Elvis movie (reportedly there is a 4 hour cut) but I wish the Priscilla relationship was beefed up.

The main focus of "Elvis" is Parker's unending attachment to Elvis to the point of controlling every aspect of his life - he sees Elvis as a money-making machine that can help with Parker's notorious gambling debts. Though Elvis's family claims Parker was a "wonderful man," there is no denying that Parker was a greedy bastard yet Tom Hanks plays him as a lovable loser who goes too far. The scene of Parker's incredulous and emotional reaction through a glass reflection of Elvis singing the glorious "If I Can Dream" at the famous 1968 TV comeback special is something to witness. We still know Parker wants to sweat every cent out of Elvis yet we do get a momentary glimpse of Parker's recognition of the kid's super talents. 

"Elvis" is a sonic boom of a movie, a cinematic odyssey of one outstanding flourish of images and colorful montages after another. This is Baz Lurhmann on hyperdrive and not one moment or image feels out of league with the story of the King of Rock N' roll. Even when Baz calms things down, there is a genuine, mystical power in seeing Austin Butler giving every ounce of himself over to the King. The movie is a workout for those who loves stable images and simplified editing but Elvis's life was too haywire to merit too much stability. 

Saturday, July 16, 2022

The Eyes of Karen Black say it all

 CAN SHE BAKE A CHERRY PIE? (1983)
Reviewed by Jerry Saravia

I once met Karen Black at a Chiller Theater convention in the early 2000's. She signed an autograph for me and was quite moved that I picked a "Family Plot" picture for her to sign ("Family Plot" was of course Hitchcock's last film). When she looked at me, her hypnotic, witchy eyes left me feeling as if I was put in a trance. It was amazing to see her look at me this way. That is why she is so perfectly and believably romantic, goofy and kooky all at the same time in "Can She Bake a Cherry Pie?" which is among Karen Black's finest performances ever. When a man looks at her, he can't help but be transfixed and how could he not be? 

Zee (Karen Black) is unable to deal with her husband leaving her. At first, I thought he was a boyfriend who had to leave for work but then we see him packing his clothes while she puts them back in the drawers and vice versa! Meanwhile, we hear the jackhammerin' outside and director Henry Jaglom has an annoying habit of cutting from the jackhammering to Zee pleading with her husband to stay, back and forth and back and forth. Oh, God, why? I still don't understand the juxtaposition nor do I understand how Jaglom frequently has his team of editors just barely cut by slivers at the end of many scenes so you get an occasionally abrupt transition that feels out of step. It works in some films but here, there are many scenes that have a simple beauty, like the guy playing with a pigeon that flies to his hand on command in long takes without abrupt cuts. The former is just an editing pattern that you can ignore due to the cast and our engaging involvement with Zee. 

The movie is primarily about Zee though not always from her point-of-view. In one stunningly moving scene, Zee starts to sob trying to order a meal at a local cafe and a near-balding social worker, Eli (Michael Emil, a true original in this type of movie), tries to comfort her. He succeeds in making her laugh and the rest of this atypical romantic comedy has them frolicking in the city, frolicking in bed while he measures his heartbeat, and then they start to really talk to each other. Zee panics and thinks people from the cafe where she met Eli are following her, yet Emil doesn't judge and tries to calm her down. Zee sometimes sings at an underpopulated bar, and sometimes she watches Orson Welles on TV doing magic tricks (I wouldn't doubt some of this footage is from Jaglom's "A Safe Place"). 

Zee sees beauty in the everyday, even in the concrete jungle of New York City. Eli loves her for that reason and these scenes really got to me on an emotional level. Karen Black encapsulates Zee's inner and outer beauty flawlessly so that when she sings, we are touched by this emotional wreck of an angel. "Can She Bake a Cherry Pie?" is awkwardly shaped at times with the introduction of needless characters at the cafe (including a very young, almost unrecognizable Larry David and that annoying pigeon expert) and though some of these interactions are cute, they do not merit half the attention we want from Zee and Eli. Zee finds some measure of hope, of belonging to someone like Eli whom you might least expect to discover such a capable romantic partner. We see it in her eyes and they do not lie. Those hypnotic, witchy eyes.