WRONG IS RIGHT (1982)
Reviewed by Jerry Saravia
It is possible that "Wrong is Right" was viewed as an over-the-top political satire in 1982 with its view of a dim President of the United States (who works out with his gym attire), amoral arms-dealers, and a cynical look at the media's lust for violence ("Network" got there first a few years earlier and with more punch). That would have been sufficient, with cynicism present in every frame of "Wrong is Right" but there's also one too many suicide bombers and the U.S.'s insatiable need for oil - these are images (along with the World Trade Center holding two atomic bombs that are ready to detonate) that may not sit so well in today's post-9/11 climate. Still, regardless of such potent, unsettling imagery, "Wrong is Right" might have worked had it not been so boring.Sean Connery is completely miscast as a superstar investigative reporter named Hale who is summoned frequently to the White House. See, Hale finds himself in the most dangerous spots around Saudi Arabia and most of the Middle East, interviewing King Awad (Ron Moody) and a terrorist leader (Henry Silva) over the purported suitcases carrying atomic devices that are set to detonate in New York City! And then Hale views the incoming televised reports at the behest of the President (George Grizzard) on the Prez's own television at the Oval Office! There is something intrinsically funny about that yet the filmmakers never bother to fully exploit it. In fact, there are long stretches of scenes where nothing comical or satiric occurs. At one point, Katharine Ross plays a federal agent who meets with some shadowy figure and then, boom, a suicide bomber kills her and the cohort! It is hard to see the humor in any of this. Most of "Wrong is Right" operates on that level, concluding with an interminable series of suspense sequences and Oval Office meetings where the President has to decide whether to resign or allow the bombs to be detonated. This is one of the first movies that I recall seeing where the pace is hurried yet nothing resembling wit is derived from its hurriedness - fast-paced delirium that leads nowhere except interminable boredom. For instance, we see the effects of nuclear annihilation and it turns out that the whole thing was a model of NYC being blown apart to smithereens - that is the level of wink-wink humor we get courtesy of writer-director Richard Brooks ("In Cold Blood"). That and its Nixonian edge with the President delivering an address with the nation with his cute pooch at his side. All the President can say with any comedic edge is, "Does anyone realize that dog is God spelled backwards?" Well, duh!
"Wrong is Right" appears to be headed for "Dr. Strangelove" territory crossed with the journalistic amorality straight from the pages of "Network." Some of it might seem eerily prescient in hindsight but dullness sets in early - there is no real satiric punch or vitality to any of this. What seemed right on the page is painfully wrong on the screen.






