Showing posts with label Super-2011 Rainn-Wilson Liv-Tyler Kevin-Bacon Ellen-Page Crimson-Bolt Boltie Michael-Rooker Troma James-Gunn superhero movies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Super-2011 Rainn-Wilson Liv-Tyler Kevin-Bacon Ellen-Page Crimson-Bolt Boltie Michael-Rooker Troma James-Gunn superhero movies. Show all posts

Thursday, September 6, 2012

Crimson Bolt wins, ugh, again

SUPER (2011)
Reviewed by Jerry Saravia

I always give credit where credit is due. Independent films always aim to tell their stories in ways that would never pass muster in a Hollywood movie. So I knew that "Super" was not going to be an average superhero comic-book movie, but I did not expect a sadistic, mean-spirited film with a conversely odd stance on violence. That is not to say that there are not things I did enjoy but, as with some presumably anti-violence pictures, it wants to have its cake and eat it too.

Rainn Wilson is Frank, a short-order cook who has been humiliated for most of his life by bullies. He is an odd duck right from the start, and you might think he is a virginal nerd with no prospects. Frank is actually married to Sarah (Liv Tyler), a recovering drug-addict who Frank thinks has been kidnapped by a drug dealer and dangerous criminal (Kevin Bacon, who is priceless). What will Frank do? He dons a badly stitched-together red costume and a wrench and becomes, wait for it, the Crimson Bolt. What does the Crimson Bolt do? He waits for crime by hiding behind dumpsters. When he catches a drug deal or witnesses sexual abuse of minors, the Bolt hits the "evil" perpetrators on the head with a wrench. And God forbid you should butt in on a long line to the movie theater - he will grab that wrench and hit you on the head. This joke is repeated far too many times, to the point that you think Frank is enjoying bashing peoples' heads in. 

That is part of the sneaking problem with "Super" - it is really not about a humiliated and neurotic man. He is actually a psychopath! Just when you think that his motives are to hurt people he deems as evil rather than kill them, enter Libby (Ellen Page), a comic-book store employee who knows and admires Frank for what he does. She decides to become his sidekick named Boltie. Libby dons a costume as well, and she believes she is supposed to kill the bad guys, or the guy who keyed her friend's car, and she enjoys it too! So we got two psychopaths! One would be enough.

"Super" could be taken as a dark fantasy masquerading as a black comedy. But the movie's extremes, especially in the last half of the film, are too vicious and hardly comical. There is a movie in here somewhere about how Frank is inspired by a Biblical superhero to do away with evil, and how having sex makes him throw up as opposed to committing acts of violence that he justifies as a "chosen" righteous avenger. He does it to save Sarah but the elements of cruelty and his savagery (including the use of pipe bombs and sharp knives, a la Wolverine, when he decides to start killing people) made me want to gag. It seems that writers today feel graphic, bloody violence can solve everything, even an underdeveloped screenplay. The violence perpetrated by Frank (which is meant to be taken seriously, unlike most comic-book movies) has to stem from the character and not feel perfunctory.

Rainn Wilson shows sympathy and gentleness as Frank in the movie's bookends but in between, the guy belongs in a mental hospital. What motivation is there for bashing a guy's head in for butting in line? And Ellen Page as Libby/Boltie laughs so maniacally and kills with such glee that she makes Mallory from "Natural Born Killers" look relatively sane. At least with Oliver Stone's film, we understood where Mallory was coming from. Libby's motivations lack clarity - who is this girl who gets positively horny when wearing her costume and practically rapes Frank? Or does she? It is hard to tell for sure.

"Super" is never boring, has some decent performances (though Michael Rooker is severely wasted as a henchman) but it is never clear what it wants to be. Director James Gunn (who had his roots in Tromaville) starts off with an ingenious, satirical idea - deconstructing and conveying reality in the world of comic-book movies - that plays for laughs, but then he segues into cruel violence that is not played for laughs. And we come away thinking that we are supposed to empathize with a nutcase who thinks God speaks to him (and the irony of this is never played out) and justifies any violent action he performs. Then the movie tries to trick me into sympathizing with him because he is trying to rescue his wife. At the same time, we are asked to excuse his violent temper, no matter how heinous. You just can't have it all three ways.